300,000 Americans are infected with Lyme each year while most do not know it! Are YOU?

Imagine waking up one morning with numbness and tingling in your legs and arms and an excruciating pain that migrates throughout your joints and muscles, settling primarily in your hips and back. Your doctor takes a basic blood panel and orders a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain, yet the results indicate that there is nothing wrong with you.

The doctor suggests that it must be stress.

The neurologist tells you that the symptoms point to multiple sclerosis or other equally frightening neurological diseases. An agonizing four weeks pass as you undergo an electroencephalogram, an electromyogram, and an MRI of the cervical spine. These tests are all negative. The rheumatologists are also puzzled and subject you to another round of twenty to thirty blood tests. Hinting at hypochondria, these doctors suggest fibromyalgia, but further inquiry reveals that this is a “catch-all” disease with no specific symptoms, no cause, and no cure. Three years have passed, and there appears to be no other choice but to live with the pain.[1]

Reality for real people

Unfortunately, this is the life of thousands of Americans.[2] “Lyme disease is the most common tickborne infection in both North America and Europe,”[3] and according to the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS),[4] Lyme disease is the fastest-growing infectious disease in America, and it may be “occur[ing] at a rate five times higher than the number of new AIDS cases.”[5] Lyme disease is everywhere: if you take a walk in a field or the woods, you can encounter a tick carrying Lyme disease.[6] One estimate is that 300,000 Americans are infected with Lyme each year.[7] “And a lot of researchers believe that a billion people are infected.”[8] But in reality, no one knows the actual number of infected people with Lyme disease.
This article will explain what Lyme disease is, provide a brief history of Lyme disease, and explain why there is a controversy surrounding chronic Lyme disease. In addition, this article will explain how the chronic Lyme controversy led to Connecticut’s Attorney General filing “the first-ever antitrust investigation against a medical society’s guidelines development process.”[9] Although Connecticut’s Attorney General entered into a settlement agreement with the medical society,[10] this article will examine whether antitrust laws could be applied to a medical guideline development process. This examination is worthwhile because there are more than 2,300 clinical practice guidelines currently listed on the National Guideline Clearinghouse web site,[11] and some of these guideline development processes could face antitrust investigations in the future.

Lyme Disease—A Brief History

Lyme disease got its name in the late 1970s, when a cluster of children and adults living in Lyme, Connecticut, began experiencing unusual arthritic symptoms.[12] Consequently, many people are under the misconception that Lyme disease is a new disease that was discovered in the 1970s.[13] But the first known condition associated with Lyme disease was recorded in Germany in 1883.[14] Although the disease has been around for more than a century, the bacterium that causes Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb bacteria), was not discovered until 1982.[15]

The black-legged deer tick[16] is the primary vector responsible for transmitting Lyme disease,[17] but research suggests that flies, gnats, mice, and mosquitoes can also transmit the Bb bacterium.[18] All vectors become infected when they bite an animal, usually a small mammal, bird, or deer,[19] which is already infected with the Bb bacteria.[20] The Bb bacteria “travels to local nerves and lymphatic channels, penetrates the blood stream, and can rapidly invade the brain without the host even knowing.”[21] There is also evidence that the Bb bacteria can also infect unborn children by crossing the placenta.[22] For example, in one case, a doctor concluded that a former Lyme patient’s eighteen-week-old fetus, which unexpectedly died in utero, died from Lyme disease because lab tests established that the baby was chromosomally normal, but “the fetus and placenta were PCR-positive[23] for Lyme bacteria.”[24]

The early stage of Lyme disease is generally characterized by a fever and flu-like symptoms, including fatigue, headache, and a mild stiff neck, and some patients develop a bull’s-eyed shaped skin rash known as erythema migrans (EM rash).[25] But every case is different, and many patients never develop the characteristic rash.[26] If the early stage of Lyme disease is left untreated or inadequately treated, it can progress and cause patients to suffer persistent health problems, such as crippling muscle and joint pain, disabling fatigue, arthritis, neurological disorders, and cardiac disorders,[27] leading to one of the biggest controversies surrounding Lyme disease—chronic Lyme disease.[28]

The actual number of Lyme-infected people is unknown for many reasons. First, many cases are never diagnosed because “laboratory tests have demonstrated serious limitations in reliability and accuracy.”[29] Moreover, many patients never know that an infected tick has bitten them because, unless engorged with blood, the deer tick is about “the size of a period at the end of [a] sentence.”[30] Second, the signs and symptoms of Lyme disease can be diverse, nonspecific, and often mimic those of many other diseases because the bacteria appear to activate the entire immune system, “resulting in a clinical presentation that looks exactly like lupus or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and many other autoimmune diseases, including sarcoidosis, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, ALS,[31] and lupus.”[32] Third, physicians have been reluctant to treat or diagnose patients suffering from Lyme disease because many physicians who have reported a large number of Lyme cases or who have treated patients with long-term antibiotics have been the “targets of State health department investigations.”[33] For example, in 2001, only eleven doctors in New York State were willing to use long-term antibiotics to treat patients with chronic Lyme disease. And of these eleven doctors, at least three were under investigation.[34] Although the identity of the complainants was kept secret by law, many people, including Assemblyman Joel M. Miller of Poughkeepsie, were convinced that the complaints “c[a]me from the insurance industry.”[35] Fourth, many states no longer require doctors to report confirmed Lyme disease cases.[36] Consequently, the actual number of Lyme-infected people is unknown, but is it probably more prevalent than reported or thought.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is a nonprofit corporation[37] that “represents over 8,000 physicians, scientists, and other health care professionals who specialize in infectious disease.” [38] The IDSA panel members have always believed that Lyme disease can be easily treated, and cured, with short-term antibiotics.[39] And physicians who treat chronic Lyme patients have, for years, complained about members of the IDSA panel and their proposed treatment plans.[40] In 2000, the IDSA issued its first set of Lyme treatment guidelines,[41] and doctors who treat Lyme patients, the Lyme Disease Association (LDA), and two of LDA’s affiliates[42] spoke out against the IDSA guidelines, complaining that the guidelines were too restrictive to properly treat and diagnose chronic Lyme patients.[43] These complaints have had dire consequences. From 1997 to 2000, “about 50 physicians in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Michigan, Oregon, Rhode Island and Texas had been investigated, disciplined or had had their licenses removed”[44] because these physicians used long-term antibiotic therapy instead of the short course recommended by the IDSA guidelines.[45] One such physician, John Bleiseiss, eventually committed suicide after the New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners charged him with inappropriate diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease.[46]

In 1993, Dr. Joseph Burrascano, Jr., an internationally known infectious disease specialist,[47] made the following statements at a hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor & Human Resources, which was the first Lyme hearing:

There is in this country a core group of university-based Lyme disease researchers and physicians whose opinions carry a great deal of weight.

Unfortunately, many of them act unscientifically and unethically. They adhere to outdated, self-serving views and attempt to personally discredit those whose opinions differ from their own. They exert strong, ethically questionable influence on medical journals, which enables them to publish and promote articles that are badly flawed. They work with Government agencies to bias the agenda of consensus meetings and have worked to exclude from these meetings and scientific seminars those with ultimate opinions.

They behave this way for reasons of personal or professional gain and are involved in obvious conflicts of interest.

. . . [T]hese individuals who promote this so-called “post Lyme syndrome” as a form of arthritis depend on funding from arthritis groups and agencies to earn their livelihood. Some of them are known to have received large consulting fees from insurance companies to advise the companies to curtail coverage for any additional therapy beyond the arbitrary 30-day course.[48]

Two months after Dr. Burrascano’s testimony, New York’s Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OPMC) began an intensive seven-year investigation of Dr. Burrascano because he treated chronic Lyme patients with long-term antibiotics.[49] Eventually, the OPMC hearing panel cleared him of any wrongdoing relating to his treatment of Lyme patients.[50]

Because the IDSA’s 2000 Guidelines were too restrictive and did not even address chronic Lyme disease, Lyme patients were unable to get properly diagnosed and treated.[51] Consequently, in mid 2006, the LDA and two of its affiliates[52] appealed to Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (AG Blumenthal), explaining that Lyme patients were being denied insurance coverage and doctors who treated Lyme patients were being investigated and prosecuted because their treatments did not conform to the 2000 IDSA Guidelines.[53]

A few months after the LDA and its affiliates appealed to AG Blumenthal, the IDSA issued a new set of guidelines, the 2006 IDSA Guidelines,[54] which were even more restrictive.[55] Shortly thereafter, AG Blumenthal served the IDSA with a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) because he was concerned that the 2006 IDSA Guidelines violated antitrust laws by restraining “doctor and patient choices for treatment of the disease,”[56] and preventing physicians’ clinical judgment.[57]

AG Blumenthal never filed an antitrust lawsuit against the IDSA because both parties entered into a settlement agreement on April 30, 2008.[58] The settlement required the IDSA to “implement an Action Plan”[59] and convene a new and independent panel[60] to assess whether its “2006 Lyme disease Guidelines should be revised or updated.”[61] In addition, the settlement agreement required the panel to “conduct an open scientific hearing . . . [to] hear scientific and medical presentations from interested parties”[62] and decide if “each recommendation in the IDSA’s 2006 Lyme disease guidelines . . . is supported by the scientific evidence.”[63] If seventy-five percent of the panel members do not vote to sustain a recommendation, the recommendation must be revised.[64] The agreement also stipulated that the 2006 IDSA Guidelines would remain in place unless the new panel determines that the guidelines should be modified or replaced.[65] On July 30, 2009, the new IDSA panel[66] held a one-day hearing in Washington, D.C., and heard testimony from eighteen speakers, including patients, physicians, and research scientists.[67] According to AG Blumenthal, the “hearing accomplished a key goal—compelling a fair and full discussion, free of conflicts of interest by panelists, so that all scientific facts and perspectives are considered before medical guidelines are established.”[68]

The new panel did not release its report until April 22, 2010.[69] According to the Review Panel, “the 2006 Lyme Guidelines were based on the highest-quality medical/scientific evidence available at the time and are supported by evidence that has been published in more recent years.”[70] In addition, the Review Panel found “that the authors of the 2006 Lyme Guidelines had [not] failed to consider or cite relevant data and references that would have altered the published recommendations.”[71] Therefore, based on the Review Panel’s findings, the 2006 IDSA Guidelines will remain in place, for now.[72] Although this is not the outcome that Lyme sufferers had hoped for, the Final Report’s conclusion did provide one statement that could be helpful to Lyme sufferers and the doctors who treat them:

· “Guidelines are not intended to be (and cannot be) rigid dicta, inflexible rules, or requirements of practice.”[73]

Because the Final Report stated that guidelines cannot be “inflexible rules or requirements of practice,” state medical boards should not be able to use the 2006 Guidelines to investigate doctors whose treatment plans do not conform to the Guidelines. As such, perhaps more doctors will be willing to use long-term antibiotics to treat patients suffering from chronic Lyme disease.

Although AG Blumenthal never filed an antitrust lawsuit against the IDSA, it is still worth examining if antitrust laws could be applied to the IDSA’s guideline development process. There are more than 2,300 clinical practice guidelines currently listed on the National Guideline Clearinghouse Website,[74] and if antitrust laws could be applied to the IDSA’s guideline development processes, some of these other medical societies could face antitrust investigations in the future.

Applying Antitrust Principles to the IDSA’s Guideline-
Development Process

The Chronic Lyme Disease Controversy

As stated earlier, the IDSA developed two sets of Lyme treatment guidelines—the 2000 and the 2006 IDSA Guidelines.[75] Before one can understand whether antitrust principles could be applied to the IDSA’s Lyme guideline development process, it is important to understand the chronic Lyme disease controversy and why the 2006 IDSA Guidelines are problematic for Lyme sufferers and the doctors who treat them. Although both guidelines have had significant impacts on Lyme disease medical care and have been used to investigate and sanction doctors who fail to follow the IDSA-suggested treatment,[76] the remainder of this article will concentrate on the information contained in the 2006 IDSA Guidelines because it is the version that is currently endorsed by the IDSA.[77]

According to the National Guideline Clearinghouse, “[c]linical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances.”[78] The IDSA claims that the main objective of its 2006 IDSA Guidelines is “[t]o provide clinicians and other health care practitioners with recommendations for the management of patients in the United States with suspected or established Lyme disease.”[79] Because medical guidelines are intended to assist practitioners and patients about appropriate health care, they should be based on all available scientific evidence. But when the IDSA developed its Lyme treatment Guidelines, it “refused to accept or meaningfully consider information regarding the existence of chronic Lyme disease.”[80]

The 2006 IDSA Guidelines are also problematic because they actually “promote the idea that Lyme is a simple, rare illness that is easy to avoid, difficult to acquire, simple to diagnose, and easily treated and cured with 30 days of antibiotics.”[81] This is simply not true. Lyme disease “often goes undiagnosed for months, years, or even forever in some patients, and [it] can render the patient chronically ill and even totally disabled.”[82] In addition, Lyme patients are often misdiagnosed because Lyme disease can manifest itself in many different ways.[83] Lyme patients have been misdiagnosed with numerous conditions, including chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,[84] multiple sclerosis, heart disease, and numerous neurological and psychological conditions,[85] such as autism, strokes, and bipolar disorder.[86]

The IDSA and its 2006 Guidelines are emphatic that antibiotics should not be used for more than a month.[87] But even when Lyme patients receive the IDSA-recommended treatment, many patients do not respond to this treatment and continue to have symptoms for years,[88] suggesting that a chronic form of the disease exists.[89] This, in turn, has led to the most controversial and problematic issue with the 2006 IDSA Guidelines—chronic Lyme disease.

Even though there are “more than 19,000 scientific studies on tick-borne diseases” that suggest chronic Lyme disease exists,[90] doctors and researchers who follow the IDSA guidelines dismiss the notion that a Lyme infection can persist after a thirty-day dose of oral antibiotics and condemn the use of long-term antibiotics,[91] claiming they are useless and potentially harmful.[92] But the ILADS has a divergent view: persistent and recurring symptoms demonstrate a continuing and chronic infection,[93] which does not always respond to the IDSA’s limited duration of two to four weeks of antibiotic treatment.[94] And despite all of the evidence concerning chronic Lyme disease, the 2006 IDSA Guidelines actually dismiss chronic Lyme disease as nothing more than “the aches and pains of daily living.”[95] The IDSA’s dismissal of the existence of chronic Lyme is problematic because the 2006 ISDA Guidelines have been “widely cited [by many doctors and insurance companies] for conclusions that chronic Lyme disease is nonexistent.”[96]

The opposing view, which is held by the ILADS and the doctors who treat chronic Lyme patients, is that the IDSA’s 30-day treatment course is “arbitrary.” [97] This opposing view is supported by a substantial body of scientific evidence that demonstrates that many chronic Lyme patients have obtained relief from their pain and suffering, and some have been cured by the use of long-term antibiotics, including intravenous antibiotics.[98] The doctors who treat chronic Lyme patients have further condemned standardized guidelines, such as the 2006 IDSA Guidelines, arguing that these guidelines prevent them from using their own clinical judgment in diagnosing and treating Lyme disease.[99]

Besides persistent health problems, such as crippling muscle and joint pain, disabling fatigue, arthritis, neurological disorders, and cardiac disorders,[100] when the Lyme bacteria invade the brain, many chronic Lyme patients also suffer from depression, thoughts of suicide, “brain fog,” [101] “headache, . . . weakness, memory or concentration difficulties, . . . clumsiness, bladder or bowel dysfunction, . . . [and] visual loss.”[102] Because many antibiotics do not effectively penetrate the blood-brain barrier, these antibiotics are not transported to the brain.[103] Consequently, these patients must be treated with intravenous antibiotics because when the antibiotics are “delivered directly into the blood, they bypass the digestive system where some of the medication is lost.”[104] And even though chronic Lyme sufferers often respond to intravenous antibiotic therapy,[105] the 2006 IDSA Guidelines do not recommend intravenous antibiotic treatment for any Lyme patients.[106]

New natural mineral kills Lyme disease

Why take risks when you don’t have to?  You can eliminate your Lyme is a few short months without antibiotics.


[1]. Interview with Lyme Disease Sufferer, in Auburn Hills, Mich. (Mar. 2, 2009).

[2]. See Examining the Adequacy of Current Diagnostic Measures and Research Activities in the Prevention and Treatment of Lyme Disease: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on Labor & Human Res., 103d Cong. 54, 56 (1993) [hereinafter 1993 Hearing] (statement of Dr. Joseph Burrascano, Jr., Physician) (stating that some patients have seen more than 40 “different physicians over several years before being properly diagnosed”); Stephen Smith, Diagnosis: Controversy More Than Two Decades Since the Threat of Lyme Disease was Recognized, Doctors and Patients are Still Warring over how to Identify and Treat it, Bos. Globe, June 25, 2007, http://www.boston.com/news/globe/health_science/articles/2007/06/25/diagnosis_controversy/. Dr. Raphael Stricker, past-president of the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS), states that most patients have “been to 10 to 20 doctors who can’t diagnose them.” Id.

[3]. Gary P. Wormser, et. al., Infectious Diseases Soc’y Am., The Clinical Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1089 (2006) [hereinafter 2006 IDSA Guidelines].

[4]. “ILADS is a nonprofit, international, multi-disciplinary medical society dedicated to the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of Lyme and its associated diseases.” ILADS, About ILADS, Int’l Lyme & Associated Diseases Soc’y, http://www.ilads.org/about_ILADS/about_us.html (last visited Oct. 10, 2010).

[5]. ILADS, ILADS Lyme Disease Treatment Guidelines Summary, Int’l Lyme & Associated Diseases Soc’y, http://www.ilads.org/lyme_disease/treatment_guidelines_summary.html (last visited Oct. 10, 2010).

[6]. See 1993 Hearing, supra note 2, at 54-55.

[7]. Press Release, Int’l Lyme & Associated Diseases Soc’y, Historic Hearings on Most Controversial Disease in U.S. (July 26, 2009), available at http://www.ilads.org/news/lyme_press_releases/60.html; see also Kenneth B. Singleton, The Lyme Disease Solution, at xxi (2008) (stating that each year, the CDC “reports more than 20,000 diagnosed cases of Lyme disease in the United States, but . . . [s]ome estimates place the actual number of cases at 10 times or more higher than reported cases”).

[8]. In Re Lyme Disease: Public Hearing Before the Conn. Dep’t of Pub. Health, 177, 179 (Conn. Jan. 29, 2004) (statement of Dr. Stephen Sinatra, Cardiologist), available at http://www.ct.gov/ag/lib/ag/health/0129lyme.pdf.

[9]. Press Release, Lyme Disease Ass’n, Settlement Announced in Landmark Investigation of Lyme Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines (May 1, 2008), available at http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=308.

[10]. See An Agreement Between the Attorney General of the State of Connecticut and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (2008) [hereinafter 2008 Settlement Agreement], available at http://www.ct.gov/ag/lib/ag/health/idsaagreement.pdf. Connecticut’s Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal, investigated the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), for anti-trust violations. Press Release, Lyme Disease Ass’n, supra note 9.

[11]. Guidelines by Topic, Nat’l Guideline Clearinghouse, http://www.guideline.gov/browse/by-topic.aspx (last visited Oct. 10, 2010). Interestingly, the 2006 IDSA Lyme Guidelines are listed on the National Guideline Clearinghouse Website, but the ILDSA Guidelines are not listed on the Website. See Guideline Summary, Nat’l Guideline Clearinghouse, http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=9537&search=lyme+guidelines (last visited Oct. 10, 2010).

[12]. A Brief History of Lyme Disease in Connecticut, Conn. Dep’t of Pub. Health, http://www.ct.gov/dph/cwp/view.asp?a=3136&q=388506 (last modified June 2, 2010); Singleton, supra note 7, at 13.

[13]. Where did Lyme Disease Come From? Is it New?, Lyme Disease Found., http://www.lyme.org/ld_history.html (last visited Oct. 10, 2010).

[14]. Id.; see also Singleton, supra note 7, at 14.

[15]. A Brief History of Lyme Disease in Connecticut, supra note 12; see also Singleton, supra note 7, at 4, 13.

[16]. The scientific name for the black-legged deer tick is Ixodesscapularis. Press Release, Infectious Diseases Soc’y Am., Updated Guidelines on Diagnosis, Treatment of Lyme Disease (Oct. 2, 2006) [hereinafter Press Release, IDSA], available at http://www.idsociety.org/Content.aspx?id=3744.

[17]. See id.

[18]. Singleton, supra note 7, at 6.

[19]. See Press Release, IDSA, supra note 16.

[20]. See Constance A. Bean with Lesley Ann Fein, Beating Lyme: Understanding and Treating This Complex and Often Misdiagnosed Disease, at xii (2008); Singleton, supra note 7, at 5.

[21]. Bean, supra note 20.

[22]. See id. at 174.

[23]. PCR is an acronym for polymerase chain reaction.

[24]. In Re Lyme Disease, supra note 8, at 57 (statement of Elise Brady, Lyme Disease Patient).


Hidden truths from the Father of Modern Colloidal Silver

Dr. Robert Beck, the Father of Modern Colloidal Silver

An Introduction to my Research

Copyright April 8, 1998 by Dr. Robert C. Beck, D.S.C., USA

I Believe the amazing breakthrough you’ll read about in the following pages is proving to be the most important medical discovery in decades–or perhaps ever.

I Believe that anyone using this knowledge will be freed from sickness, infections, diseases and toxins, the third most common cause of all casualties in the US and the first cause of deaths in the third world.

I Believe this tested and true information can forever release anyone from doctors, pharmaceuticals, medicines of any description, hospitals, and incurable diseases presently known or undiscovered, plus biological warfare agents. Even cancer disappears when interleuken and interferon are again produced by a restored immune system.

Yet experience shows that 85% of the population will ignore, disbelieve, or vigorously resist these data: they’re too simple, cheap, effective and revolutionary. This also requires assuming responsibility for your own health. Medical “authorities” may never tell you this secret since it could ruin their incomes. You’ll see why this dynamite truth must be suppressed to preserve medical profiteering and egos.

What is colloidal silver?

It’s now scientifically established that mild, safe and simple electrification neutralizes all bacteria, germs, viruses, parasites, pathogens, fungi and other foreign invaders in blood. Results are rapid, dirt cheap, comfortable and without side effects. Medical “cures” once strove to match expensive antibiotics to the few germs they killed before many diseases evolved as strain-resistant. Today’s new paradigm is harmless, infallible, and hasn’t encountered any resistant micro-organism. Unlike antibiotics and vaccines and their targets, you don’t even care what anything is called medically. Nothing known or unknown remains “incurable”.

How? Average adults have eight pints of blood harboring trillions of hostile pathogens and viruses, plus their mutations-the progeny of thousands of invaders. Your blood normally circulates past a given point in under nine minutes. So when you attach electrodes directly outside arterial pulse points on one wrist, a gentle biphasic electric stimulus applied for a few hours introduces a comfortable 50-100m A (microamperes) into your flowing blood without puncturing skin. This causes spontaneous remissions of any known, unknown or emerging diseases. Techniques developed since 1991 (Beck) have enabled hundreds of previously sick and dying subjects to experience sero-conversion of AIDS, regain health and become symptom-free as verified by before-and-after PCR and other tests. Previous sufferers from numerous other “incurable” conditions are now well again. Many had undergone every medical treatment known with no cures. Electrification, rediscovered and reported many times over the years, has been mentioned briefly in journals since the 1800′s then suppressed or disbelieved. Electrification’s most recent rediscovery was in 1990 at Einstein College of Medicine by Kaali and variations re-patented. (Example: US Patent #5,188,738 in 1993).

Aids research a waste of money?

My research shows everything necessary to take back your power and free anyone from slavery to disease and to the avarice and incompetence of health professionals who have wasted over 1.3 billion dollars to date on non-existent antibiotics and vaccines for “incurable” AIDS alone. If you choose to build your own device for electrification, there’s nothing else to buy besides a few electronic parts which should last indefinitely. After that the only cost is for replacement batteries, or about $2.00 per total “cure” for any known disease. Excellent professional instruments are offered by several ethical manufacturers if you’re in a hurry or can’tt build your own.

An obvious problem is this suppressed “secret” can decimate hospital, pharmaceutical, doctor, and “health care” incomes. “A patient cured is a customer lost.” Also it could overload Social Security rolls with healthy citizens over 65. It restores health and “well being-ness” to anyone who applies it correctly. Combined with Kilogauss magnetic pulsing of lymph and organs to induce back-e.m.f. which scavenges latent and germinating pathogens, and silver colloids to control secondary and opportunistic infections, plus rapid detoxification with ozonated drinking water, this is proving to be the best Universal CURE-AILL ever known! It’s YOURS. It’s PERFECTED. It’s here NOW.

Although not destined to be “politically correct” except in the underground, and generally doubted by skeptics who haven’t tried it or are threatened, you can easily use these data secretly to heal yourself and your friends. It may never be approved by the FDA. But hundreds of fully recovered patients who’ve used electrification are today’s living proof that IT WORKS! I personally have nothing for sale.

Most respected colloidal silver around

Here is your opportunity to get the very best colloidal silver for you and your loved ones.

Stop Using Antibiotics; There is a Safe and natural Way to Heal

The Endless Uses of Colloidal Silver Spray

Supplements that have a silver component and medications such as Colloidal Silver spray are popularly used by people and largely recommended by doctors to patients for treatment of different problems. Silver is found through from the earth’s surface in its pure form and in a few minerals as well as an alloy with gold and other metals.

Silver is largely used in the medical sector for the treatment of infections, wounds, burns, cancer, diabetes and many other problems. Colloidal Silver spray can be used in many ways to achieve multiple health benefits. It is highly popular for healing burns rapidly without scarring and for having sterilizing properties. Therefore, it is highly recommended that this colloidal silver be used in drinking water during camping and traveling, especially in the third world countries and sterilize all equipment on which health matter such as toothbrushes, surgical equipments, shavers, razors, scissors, nail cutters etc. Moreover, Colloidal Silver spray can also be used to treat sunburn, razor nicks, wounds, abrasions, bandages, insect bites, rashes and bandages but the most amazing effect of this spray is seen when it is sprayed on garbage to reduce and prevent decay odors.

The spray is largely known for its antibacterial qualities and is thus recommended for use on kitchen items such as sponges, cutting boards and towels as it effectively kills bacteria such as E. coli and salmonella. In turn, this activity prevents gastrointestinal inflammation and food poisoning.  It can also be used as a preventative during canning and as treatment for acne, zits, dandruff, skin rashes, psoriasis, fungi, athletes foot, itch and even respiratory infections, flu, cold, rhino viruses and colon irrigation. Problems associated with mouth such as tooth decay, toothaches, bad breath and bacterial irritations can also be treated with Colloidal Silver spray. Usually, chlorine is used in places such as saunas, Jacuzzis, dishwashers, bath tubs, shower mats and swimming pools but this silver spray works equally amazingly. Places such as urinals, bowls, door knobs, toilet seats and sinks can also be treated with the silver spray to remove impurities and cleanse for a fresher look. The spray can be found easily in the market and bought for having a range of uses. From household appliances to washrooms to kitchen products to health and wellness to cleaning wellness equipment, this spray works wonders everywhere.

Colloidal Silver spray is a good value for money and if not in the market, it is definitely available on many websites and hence, can be bought from the internet. This would also bring a great deal of money saving and leave the buyers with something that would blow the mind away.

Coming soon to you for endless healing applications

NutraSilver, a leading colloidal silver product, will soon offer 25 PPM colloidal silver spray in 2 and 4 ounce spray bottles.  Customers are telling us to hurry since NutraSilver has proven effective on major illnesses through FDA-certified independent lab tests.

Cause of Morgellons Disease May Have Been Discovered: Research Update November 2012

Research Update …

Scientists Pursue Connection between Infectious Disease Afflicting Cattle and Morgellons Disease Affecting Humans


Progress moves forward as more research shows Morgellons disease has a physiologic (physical not mental) basis.

The Morgellons break through started with the research publication, Filament Formation Associated with Spirochetal Infection: a comparative approach to Morgellons Disease by Marianne Middelveen, a Canadian veterinary microbiologist and Raphael this peer reviewed publication appeared in the November, 2011 issue of Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257881

Why is this important?

In November, 2011, Middelveen and Stricker reported to have found evidence of a veterinary analog to Morgellons (MD). BDD, an infectious disease which has plagued cattle for decades, has fibers/filaments within their tissue and lesions that were recognized as a match to those found in the controversial disease known as Morgellons (MD) in humans. Studies on fibers/filaments from cattle with the bovine hoof disease and those found in MD suffers provided startling evidence challenging the dermatologists’ unfounded assumption that MD is a psychiatric disorder called “Delusions of Parasitosis”. Anyone who suffers from Morgellons knows how real these symptoms are and how disheartening it is to be told it is all in your head. Although the publication stated that the etiology (cause) of MD was not yet known, the findings by Middelveen and Stricker provided corroborative evidence to support a physiological and, perhaps, infectious etiology, lending a new direction for further research.

Second Study Announced by the CEHF on May 16, 2012

cover journal of clinical experimental derm research 2.jpg


Indeed, their second study, Morgellons Disease: A Chemical and Light Microscopic Study, published May, 2012 in the peer reviewed publication, Journal of Clinical & Experimental Dermatology Research, continued this BDD and MD comparison in greater detail. Researchers were able to conduct a more in-depth analysis of dermatological specimens from three Morgellons patients and biopsies from cattle with proliferative late stage BDD. Examinations were conducted by light microscopy, by chemical experiments and by immunohistological testing.

Results of the Study …

These findings confirmed that filaments/fibers from both bovine and human samples were similar in formation at the cellular level and had the chemical and physical properties of keratin. The composition of MD filaments from humans was confirmed to be keratin by immunohistological staining with antibodies specific for human keratins. Fibers from three human patients were found to be biological in origin and are produced by keratinocytes in epithelial and follicular tissues.

An interesting side note is that researchers Middelveen and Stricker found filaments/fibers associated with MD beneath unbroken skin as well as in lesions, thus, demonstrating they are not self-implanted. This confirms previous research from Dr. Randy Wymore at the OSU-Center for the Investigation of Morgellons Disease.

Why is this important?

The original premise–that MD is physiological is holding up to the test of scientific scrutiny.

Morgellons Study Cited by Faculty of 1000


The quality and importance of this research is highlighted in Faculty of 1000 Award.

F 1000-MAG COVER.png

Faculty of 1000 (F1000) is a global community of over 10,000 experts who select, rate and evaluate the very best articles in biology and medicine. The core mission of the F1000 is to identify and evaluate the most important articles in biology and medical research publications. The organization highlights and brings awareness to significant new research. The selection of Morgellons Disease: A Chemical and Light Microscopic Study places the work in this work in the top 2% of published articles in these fields. It classifies the study as “must read” and is certainly an honor for the entire research team. More information can be accessed at the F1000 website (http://f1000.com/716597867).

Thank You and Congratulations to Our Researchers!!

No one can apply to be considered for this. This research was chosen and recognized on its merits and for the importance it holds worldwide. Everyone at The Charles E. Holman Foundation and from the Morgellons community wish to express our congratulations to Marianne Middelveen, Elizabeth Rasmussen, Douglas Kahn, and Raphael Stricker for this recognition. The award was indeed serendipity.


We now have documented, peer reviewed evidence published, corroborating MD is not Delusions of Parasitosis.

MD, like BBD, has a true physical cause. “ … Because BDD is a disease in which spirochetes have been identified as primary etiologic agents, and spirochetal sero-reactivity has been associated with MD, it is reasonable to assume that spirochetal infection plays an important role in MD… Further immunohistological and electron microscopy studies are needed to solve the mystery of Morgellons …” (Middelveen and Stricker). This points the way to the next step in our research. To paraphrase Paul Harvey, stay tuned in and signed up for the next edition of Keeping You in the Loop …for the “rest of the story.”

Morgellons sufferer talks about her recovery

Want to find out more about how Connie eliminated her Morgellons symptoms?  Here you go....

Exposing The Cause of All Inflamation, Allergies and Respitory Infections

According to new research published in the Journal of Leukocyte Biology, a common bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, is involved in some cases of respiratory inflammation that can lead to allergies, asthma or other serious respiratory conditions.

Here’s what an article published on the website of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology had to say

about the study:

“Could some cases of asthma actually be caused by an allergic reaction to a common environmental bacteria?  New research findings published in the Journal of Leukocyte Biology suggests that this idea may not be as far-fetched as it seems.
In a research report appearing in the February 2012 print issue, researchers show a link between common environmental bacteria and airway inflammation.
Specifically, their research suggests that some strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cause white blood cells to produce very high levels of histamine, which in turn leads to inflammation, a hallmark symptom of asthma.”
Of course, excessive histamine release is also a hallmark symptom of common allergies, too, particularly the red, itchy eyes, puffy skin, runny nose and sometimes painful, swollen nasal passages.
The article goes on to admit that modern medicine doesn’t really have a good handle on what causes such allergic reactions.  But they hope this most recent study will shed some light on the possible role of bacteria such as Pseudomona aeruginosa in triggering such reactions:
“Despite advances in diagnosing and treating the symptoms of asthma and allergy, our understanding of the underlying initiating events remains elusive,” said John Wherry, Ph.D., Deputy Editor of the Journal of Leukocyte Biology.
“This report helps shed light on how an ‘everyday organism’ might trigger asthma and allergy from an immune cell type not normally thought to be involved in allergic disease.”

Colloidal Silver to the Rescue!

What the researchers are not yet talking about is the fact that numerous published clinical studies and reports have proven the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenis highly susceptible to antimicrobial silver, including colloidal silver!
Indeed, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the very same bacteria that tends to infect the skin of burn victims, leading to practically unstoppable skin infections that ultimately result in death. 
But various forms of antimicrobial silver – including silver compounds such as dilute silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine cream — have been used in hospital burn wards for decades to stop Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in their tracks.

Indeed, these silver-based products have saved literally tens of thousands of burn victims from suffering painful, agonizing deaths that would otherwise be caused by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogen!

Connecting the Dots

The fact that Cystic Fibrosis patients often suffer from Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in their lungs is nothing new.  Doctors have known of this for decades.
And recent studies have also demonstrated that Pseudomonas aeruginosa are increasingly involved in C.O.P.D., i.e., Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.  (See study here.)

So why not also in respiratory conditions such as allergy and asthma?

Way back in Nov-Dec of 1955, a study titled “Bronchial Asthma Caused By Pseudomonas aeruginosa Diagnosed By Bronchoscopic Examination” was published in journal Annals of Allergy.
But in spite of that older study, until only recently the standard response from medical science has been “There is no known association between asthma and Pseudomonas aeruginosainfections.”
I’m quite surprised researchers have not connected the dots by now and realized that inflammatory lung conditions like Cystic Fibrosis, other lung conditions like C.O.P.D.,  and conditions of respiratory inflammation such as asthma and allergy might have a single common bacterial connection.
After all, it seems the more scientists look, the more they find pathogenic microorganisms behind ailments people have suffered from (often needlessly) for years.

Annoying Sinus Allergy Condition Resolved!

“…an employee had a severe (annoying to me) sinus condition that she had been fighting for about 3-4 years with antibiotics that would work for a while then come back.
She had it so bad she actually had a Family Medical Leave Act ‘sick leave’ to protect her attendance (reporting off from work), and from losing her job because of it.
I gave her some info on colloidal silver in general and she ended up trying some (pouring some into her nasal cavities).

After a week or two her condition is all but gone, with just a few ‘allergy flare ups’ which are nothing compared to how miserable she was and annoying to us with her constant snorting/blowing her nose.”

Nutrasilver tested for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 2006

In an FDA-certified independant lab test, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was tested and the results were amazing kill rates.  You can see the actual test here and click on “water-borne Pathogens”.

Colloidal Silver: Risk Without Benefit (QuackWatch)

This article was published a number of years ago and seems to present a reasonable discussion about colloidal silver, its safety and efficacy. The sad truth is that this kind of mis-information is designed to convince the reader that colloidal silver is dangerous. Nothing could be further from the truth, unless you own a Pharmaceutical company.


Stephen Barrett, M.D.

Colloidal silver is a suspension of submicroscopic metallic silver particles in a colloidal base. Long-term use of silver preparations can lead to argyria, a condition in which silver salts deposit in the skin, eyes, and internal organs, and the skin turns ashen-gray. Many cases of argyria occurred during the pre-antibiotic era when silver was a common ingredient in nosedrops. When the cause became apparent, doctors stopped recommending their use, and reputable manufacturers stopped producing them. The official drug guidebooks (United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary) have not listed colloidal silver products since 1975.

Reply; Colloidal silver manufacturing techniques have evolved to produce nano-sized silver particles which do not product argyria. Large particle colloidal silver stopped being manufactured commercially in the early 1970’s so this statement is irrelevant today.

Dubious Ads

In recent years, silver-containing products have been marketed with unsubstantiated claims that they are effective against AIDS, cancer, infectious diseases, parasites, chronic fatigue, acne, warts, hemorrhoids, enlarged prostate, and many other diseases and conditions. Some marketers claim that colloidal silver is effective against hundreds of diseases.

During 1997 and 1998, Changes International, a Florida-based multilevel company, stated:

Our colloidal silver contains 99.99% pure silver particles suspended indefinitely in demineralized water that kills bacteria and viruses. It can be applied topically and/or absorbed into the blood stream sub-lingually (under the tongue), thereby avoiding the negative effects of traditional antibiotics that kill good bacteria in the lower digestive tract.

An all natural antibiotic alternative in the purest form available. The presence of colloidal silver near a virus, fungi, bacterium or any other single celled pathogen disables its oxygen-metabolism enzyme, its chemical lung, so to say. The pathogens suffocates and dies, and is cleared out of the body by the immune, lymphatic and elimination systems.

Unlike pharmaceutical antibiotics which destroy beneficial enzymes, colloidal silver leaves these beneficial enzymes intact. Thus colloidal silver is absolutely safe for humans, reptiles, plants and all multi-celled living matter.

It is impossible for single-celled germs to mutate into silver-resistant forms, as happens with conventional antibiotics. Also, colloidal silver cannot interact or interfere with other medicines being taken. Colloidal silver is truly a safe, natural remedy for many of mankind’s ills. Colloidal silver can be taken indefinitely because the body does not develop a tolerance to it [1].

Reply; What individuals say about colloidal silver on the Internet or anywhere else is also irrelevant to this discussion. It is interesting to note that hundreds of prominent Universities across America actually AGREE with most of the claims here as a result of intense independent lab tests.

Seasilver International, a California-based multilevel company, had claimed that American are suffering from “silver deficiency.” Although silver is not an essential nutrient, product information posted on the company’s Web site several years ago stated:

The depletion of minerals in our soil has left us deficient of silver, one of our most essential trace minerals, causing a drastic increase in immune system disorders in our society in the last decade. Research has taught us that all disease is allowed to manifest itself because of a weakened immune system. In over 20 years of worldwide research on Colloidal Silver, numerous interviews with government agencies, health care practitioners and their patients, no other nutrient, herb or drug (prescription or over-the-counter) is as safe and effective against all known forms of unfriendly virus, bacteria, and fungus. Additionally, while it is generally known that most antibiotics kill only perhaps 6 or 7 different disease organisms, reports have shown that Colloidal Silver has been used successfully in the treatment of over 650 diseases! Furthermore, strains of disease organisms fail to develop in the presence of Colloidal Silver. Colloidal Silver’s greatest attribute is its unique ability to function as a superior second immune system in the body! [2]

Reply; The claim of 650 disease being cured came from a study conducted at UCLA in California that proved that colloidal silver is highly effective.

Critical Studies and Case Reports

In 1995, an herbal distributor named Leslie Taylor tested nine commonly marketed colloidal silver products available at health-food stores and concluded:

  • Two of the products were contaminated with microorganisms.
  • The amount of silver suspended in solution varied from product to product and would gradually decrease over time.
  • Only five products actually showed antibacterial activity in a laboratory test. To perform the test, she prepared a culture plate with Staphylococcus aureas bacteria, which can cause infections in humans. She then placed a drop from each product on the plate and used disks of two common antibiotics as controls. After eight hours of incubation, she found that bacterial growth had been inhibited around the antibiotics and four of the products.

Of course, the fact that a product inhibits bacteria in a laboratory culture doesn’t mean it is effective (or safe) in the human body. In fact, products that kill bacteria in the laboratory would be more likely to cause argyria because they contain more silver ions that are free to deposit in the user’s skin.

Reply; Who is this investigator and how is any of this information substantiated? No proof here.

FDA laboratory studies have found that the amount of silver in some product samples has varied from 15.2% to 124% of the amount listed on the product labels. The amount of silver required to produce argyria is unknown.

Reply; NutraSilver is tested in FDA-certified labs to be 3,600 PPM without any contaminants. It is not possible to comment on every colloidal silver mistake made.

However, the FDA has concluded that the risk of using silver products exceeds any unsubstantiated benefit [3]. So far, eleven cases of argyria related to silver products have been reported:

  • A 56-year-old man who had sold and used colloidal silver for three years, developed blue/gray discoloration of his fingernails accompanied by a very high blood level of silver [4].

Reply; It is NOT POSSIBLE to get argyria after only three years of use unless this person added large amounts of salt or chlorides to make their own colloidal silver.

  • A married couple who had three years of daily consumption of a drink prepared by administering an electrolytic charge to a bowl of water that contained a silver bar [5].
  • Another couple had been taking a silver-containing “dietary supplement” prescribed by a naturopath [5].
  • A mentally ill man who had been drinking silver-containing herbal tea for about 10 months [5].
  • Stan Jones, Montana’s Libertarian Party candidate for the U.S. Senate, who reportedly started taking colloidal silver in 1999 for fear that Y2K disruptions might lead to a shortage of antibiotics. He made his own concoction by electrically two silver wires in a glass of water [6].

Reply; Mr. Jones made his own concoction of colloidal silver with salt included. He DID NOT take colloidal silver, he took silver COMPOUNDS which is not colloidal silver.

  • Two men, ages 63 and 76, developed argyria after a year of product use inspired by Internet claims [7].
  • A 16-year-old boy developed blue-gray pigmentation of his entire body after ingesting a silver-containing dietary supplement for a year. The product, packaged so that it was identical to bottled water was touted as a preventive for everyday infections [8].
  • A 58-year-old man who treated a presumed kidney infection with a home-brewed colloidal solution 12 times a day for 4 days developed argyria about 4 weeks later [9].
  • A 38-year-old man developed argyria after ingesting approximately 16 ounces of 450 ppm colloidal silver three times a day for 10 months to treat his arthritis and other conditions. He made the solution with a simple battery-operated chamber that leached silver from pure silver wire. He had obtained the plans from information on the Internet [10]. The photograph to the right shows how his skin color compares to that of normal skin.

Reply; Again, Quackwatch does not present the real facts; these people made their own CS and used salt to product silver COMPOUNDS, not colloidal silver.

Enforcement Actions

Between October 1993 and September 1994, the FDA issued warning letters to five colloidal silver marketers:

  • Higher Education Library Publications (H.E.L.P.), of Springfield, Utah, was ordered to stop claiming that its colloidal silver product was effective as a natural antibiotic and might be effective against cancer, genito-urinary diseases, tuberculosis, and AIDS.
  • Nutrition, Inc., of Arvada, Colorado, was ordered to stop stating or implying that its Silvicidal, when administered orally or intravenously, was nontoxic, FDA-approved, and was a broad-spectrum antibiotic that killed bacteria and all virus and fungal infections. In addition, it was falsely claimed to be effective against a long list of specific diseases.
  • Reseau International of Cincinnati, Ohio was ordered to stop claiming that its colloidal silver product was a “natural antibiotic and anti-inflammatory immune system stimulant” and that it was effective against cancer, staph, strep, influenza, general body infections, inflammation, impaired immune system, fungus toxicity, tonsillitis, Meniere’s symptoms, whooping cough, shingles, syphilis, cholera, and malaria. The labeling also stated that colloidal silver could cause major growth stimulation of human tissues and can regenerate
  • Silverado Inc., of Bountiful, Utah, was warned to stop making false claims that its colloidal silver product was effective as an antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, and anti-fungal agent and that it could stimulate the immune system.
  • Unic, of Carmichael, California, was ordered to stop claiming that its colloidal silver product was effective against many diseases and could heal burn-damaged tissue without scarring.

Reply; let’s get real clear here; the objections of the FDA are completely centered on the words used to inform the public about the real benefits of CS, not colloidal silver. Colloidal silver manufactures are prohibited by FDA regulations from making any claims whatsoever, even if they are true and irrefutable.

In October 1996, the FDA proposed to ban the use of colloidal silver or silver salts in over-the-counter products [11].

Reply; Again Quackwatch gets their facts totally wrong. CAN YOU GO TO A Health Food store and buy colloidal silver today? Yes, of course! So how is it that QW says colloidal silver is banned?

A Final Rule banning such use was issued on August 17, 1999 and became effective September 16th. The rule applies to any nonprescription colloidal silver or silver salt product claimed to be effective in preventing or treating any disease [12]. Silver products can still be sold as “dietary supplements” provided that no health claims are made for them. During 2000, the FDA issued warnings to more than 20 companies whose Web sites were making illegal therapeutic claims for colloidal silver products.

In 2000, the Federal Court of Australia banned Vital Earth Company Pty Limited and its director Darryl John Jones from falsely representing that the colloidal silver produced by their “Vital Silver 3000 Zapper,” “Vital Silver 2000 Automatic” and “Vital Silver 2000”:

  • Can kill all disease-causing bacteria, fungi and virus within six minutes of contact
  • Has no harmful side effects; that colloidal silver could be used as an antibiotic for all the acquired diseases of active AIDS
  • Is effective with more than 650 different pathogenic bacteria and virus types
  • Has been used successfully against diseases including AIDS, cholera, diabetes, leprosy, leukemia, lupus, skin cancer, syphilis and whooping cough.

The company was also ordered to pay AUS$9000 in costs and to provide refunds [13].

In 2001, the FTC obtained consent agreements with two companies:

  • Robert C. Spencer and Lisa M. Spencer, doing business as Aaron Company (Palm Bay, Florida). Colloidal silver has been medically proven to kill over 650 disease-causing organisms in the body and is effective in curing diseases ranging from cancer and multiple sclerosis to HIV/AIDS [14].
  • ForMor, Inc., doing business as ForMor International, and its president, Stan Gross (Birmingham, Alabama) agreed not to make unsubstantiated claims that colloidal silver is effective in treating over 650 infectious diseases, has no adverse side effects, and is effective against arthritis, blood poisoning, cancer, cholera, diphtheria, diabetes, dysentery, gonorrhea, herpes, influenza, leprosy, lupus, malaria, meningitis, rheumatism, shingles, staph infections, strep infections, syphilis, tuberculosis, whooping cough, and yeast infections [14].

In 2002, the FTC obtained a consent agreement with Kris Pletschke, doing business as Raw Health, agreed to stop making unsubstantiated claims that its colloidal silver product could treat or cure 650 different diseases; eliminate all pathogens in the human body in six minutes or less; and is medically proven to kill every destructive bacterial, viral, and fungal organism in the body, including anthrax, Ebola, Hanta, and flesh-eating bacteria [15].

In 2002, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration amended its rules so that water-treatment products containing substances like colloidal silver for which therapeutic claims are made must meet the requirements of medicines included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. This means that such products can no longer be legally marketed without proof that they are safe and effective for their intended purpose. The amendment was based on clnclusions that:

  • There is little evidence to support therapeutic claims made for colloidal silver products;
  • The risk to consumers of silver toxicity outweighs the value of trying an unsubstantiated treatment, and bacterial resistance to silver can occur
  • Efforts should be made to curb the illegal availability of colloidal silver products, which is a significant public health issue [16].

Reply; All of these mentions center around what people can say, not about colloidal silver is or how it performs. If you wish to see the truth about colloidal silver in FDA-certified independent lab test, demonstrate that NutraSilver kills pathogens in-vitro quickly, safely and without the horrible side effects of mico-toxins (antibiotics).

The argument is weak, unsubstantiated and designed specifically to to support the Pharmaceutical companies efforts to convince you to use their antibiotics instead of a harmless, benign natural mineral.

For the best colloidal silver to ensure the health of you and your family, try NutraSilver and experience the incredible healing that you deserve.


  1. Product brochure. Changes International, 1997. Downloaded in 1998.
  2. Seasilver International Product Information, accessed October 12, 1998.
  3. Fung MC, Bowen DL. Silver products for medical indications: risk-benefit assessment. Journal of Toxicology and Clinical Toxicology 34:119-26, 1996.
  4. Gulbranson SH and others. Argyria following the use of dietary supplements containing colloidal silver protein. Cutis 66:373-374, 2000.
  5. Hori K and others. Believe it or not—Silver still poisons! Veterinary and Human Toxicology 44(5):291-292, 2002.
  6. Blue Is the color of my candidate’s skin. Associated Press, Oct 2, 2002
  7. Cohen LE and others. Effects of Internet quackery: Argyria in the silver state. Federal Practitioner 21(4):9-17, 2004.
  8. Wickless SC, Schwader TA. Medical mystery—The answer. New England Journal of Medicine 352:2349-2350, 2004.
  9. Brandt D. Argyia secondary to ingestion of homemade silver solition. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 53:S105-107, 2005.
  10. Wadhera A, Fung M. Systemic argyria associated with ingestion of colloidal silver. Dermatology Online Journal 11(1):12, 2005.
  11. Federal Register 61:53685-53688, 1996. (To access this document, search the 1996 volume for “colloidal silver.”)
  12. FDA. Final rule: Over-the-counter drug products containing colloidal silver ingredients or silver salts. Federal Register 64:44653-44658, 1999. Download PDF version
  13. Refunds for buyers of alternative therapy devices. News release, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, May 5, 2000.
  14. “Operation Cure.All” wages new battle in ongoing war against Internet health fraud. FTC news release, June 14, 2001.
  15. FTC announces first two enforcement actions against purveyors of bioterrorism defense products. FTC news release, Feb 27, 2002.
  16. Regulation of colloidal silver and related products. Therapeutic Goods Administration Web site, Aug 19, 2003.

Colloidal Silver for Pink Eye

Benefits of colloidal silver for conjunctivitis are described in this article

 Colloidal silver consists of suspension of fine particles of silver in dispersion medium of distilled water. It possesses excellent natural antibiotic properties which enable it to fight various infections caused by virus, fungus, bacteria and many other micro organisms. It can fight off even those bacteria that have become immune to regular antibiotic medicines. Another advantage is that colloids are one such submicroscopic particles of matter that can penetrate through the membranes of the cells in our body. Thus colloidal silver can be readily absorbed into the body. For all these qualities, more and more people opt for colloidal silver treatment.

Colloidal Silver and Pink Eye

Pink eye is also referred to as conjunctivitis. In this condition, inflammation occur on the transparent mucous membrane that covers the eyeball and eyelid lining. This is mostly caused due to bacterial and viral infection. Some common symptoms of pink eye are redness in eyes, itchiness and burning sensation, swollen eyelids, excessive tear, sticky discharge from the eyes. Even though the symptoms causes a lot of discomfort, it is not a serious ailment. However, it is highly contagious and spread from an infected person to others around him or her very rapidly.

For a prompt action against this highly infectious virus and bacteria, colloidal silver is used. When colloidal silver is applied on the infected eye, the tiny silver colloids pick up the infected cells by attracting them electromagnetically and put them into the bloodstream. In this way, the germs are eliminated from the body.

Similarly, you can use colloidal silver for stye. Staphylococcus bacteria is mainly responsible for this eye infection that affects the oil secreting glands present at the root of the eyelash. Eye stye can be identified as a fluid filled blister with yellowish spot at center. On application of colloidal silver, the bacteria get killed and the bump will be healed.

How to Use Colloidal Silver for Pink Eye?

Colloidal silver can be used both internally as well as externally. By the topical usage of colloidal silver, pink eye can be treated. It can be used as eye drops. For this, wash your hands with soap and water thoroughly to make them free from germs. Open the infected eyelid with one hand and put 2 – 3 drops of colloidal silver into the eye. If both eyes are infected, then apply it on the other eye too. You have to repeat it 3 – 4 times in a day. If you want, you can put it into a spray bottle and spray it into the eyes. You can also prepare an eyewash by diluting a few drops of colloidal silver in water and using it to disinfect the eyes.

You will be surprised to know that colloidal silver can provide relief from the symptoms of pink eye within a few hours. However, you must continue to use colloidal silver for conjunctivitis for the next few days to get rid of the infection completely. If you fear that you may get stinging sensation after application, then let me assure you that it does not sting at all. In fact, it is suitable for people of any age group including small babies, children and elderly. In order to obtain the best results from this treatment, you can take colloidal silver orally as well. This will strengthen your immune system, enable your body to recover from the infection really fast and reduce the chances of further infection.

The best part of using colloidal silver for pink eye is that it does not have any side effects

Nutrasilver has been helping Moms and babies with Pink-eye for many years.  I have used it on my 2- month old Granddaughter’s pick-eye and within an hour, her eyes were perfectly clear. She continued to do her job of being a happy baby with no complaint.

Colloidal Silver; Real Science, Real Results

The medical community at large generally ignors the science of how colloidal silver is SUPERIOR to antibiotics.  Below is a brief list of prominant research the demonstrates conclusively that colloidal silver is safe and effective;

1) The FDA has stated that because colloidal silver has been in used for over 60 years (prior to 1938), it may continue to be marketed (Sept. 13, 1991, letter from consumer safety officer, Harold Davis, U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Additionally, the FDA has no jurisdiction over a pure, mineral element. However, the FDA restricts what can and cannot be said about colloidal silver and no claims can be made about its properties.

2) Dr. Robert Becker’s “The Body Electric” recognizes a correlation between low levels of silver and sickness. He stated that the silver deficiency is responsible for the improper functioning of the immune system. Dr. Becker’s research concluded that silver works on the full spectrum of pathogens without any side effects or damage to any cells of the body.

He also states that the silver was doing something more than killing disease-causing organisms. It was also causing major growth stimulation of injured tissue. Burn patients and even elderly patients noticed more rapid healing. And he discovered that all cancer cells change back to normal cells.

All strains of pathogens resistant to other antibiotics may be killed by colloidal silver.

3) Dr. W.J. Simpson, C.M.G., M.D., (Professor of Hygiene) Kings College, London, and Dr. R. Tanner Hewlefler, M.D., F.R.C.P. (Professor of Bacteriology) University of London, published an article in The Lancet, back in Dec. 1944. In essence, it said that the typhoid bacillus, which they were working on, was killed outright by the silver colloid solution.

4) Alfred Searle, founder of the pharmaceutical conglomerate, wrote in 1919: “Applying colloidal silver to human subjects has been done in a large number of cases with astonishingly successful results. For internal administration, orally, or hypodermically, it has the advantage of being rapidly fatal to parasites without toxic action on its host. It is quite stable”.

5) “Colloidal Preparations of Silver in Pharmacy”, British Medical Journal, February 1923. Pure silver is entirely non-irritant. In tests, at very high dilution rates it has been shown repeatedly that the rapid exerted disinfectant action is of considerable therapeutic value.

6) Alexander Tomasz, M.D. of the Rockefeller University of New York City, states: “Common bacteria that cause pneumonia, children’s ear infections and many other diseases are evolving into forms untreatable by all known medicines, threatening a frightening post-antibiotic era that is a looming medical disaster”.

7) “Silver our mightiest Germ Fighter”, Science Digest of March 1978. As an antibiotic, silver kills hundreds of disease-causing organisms, and resistant strains fail to develop. Silver is absolutely non-toxic and the best all round germ fighter that we have. Doctors are reporting that, taken internally, it works in cases of syphilis, cholera, malaria, diabetes and severe burns. Richard L. Davies, executive director of The Silver Institute, which monitors Silver technology in 37 countries, reports: “In four years, we’ve described 87 important new medical uses for silver”.

8) Dr. Bjorn Nordstrom, of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, has used silver in his cancer cure method for many years. He says the whole thing is very simple. This brought rapid remission in patients given up by other doctors.

9) Rather than in a chemical compound, silver, in a colloidal state, may be applied in a much-concentrated form, with corresponding better results.

10) According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Poison Control Center, colloidal silver is considered harmless. Dr Samuel Etris, a senior consultant at The Silver Institute, reports that there has never been any allergic, toxic, or carcinogenic reaction to colloidal silver. The U.S. Government’s Center for Disease Control confirmed that fact in 1995.

Where can you get the very best colloidal silver in the world?

Most colloidal silvers are made using electrical currents pulsing through silver rods that are submerged in distilled water. The result is that the electrical current flows through the rods and kicks out silver ions into the distilled water which means there’s actually no real silver in it at all! That’s called ionic colloidal silver.

That said, though we don’t make NutraSilver that way, there’s nothing wrong with ionic colloidal silver. Any colloidal silver made that way is probably a great product, it comes out nice and clear like water. The issue is that the concentration is always weak (won’t kill powerful infections) and ionic colloidal silver isn’t made using real metallic silver particles.

NutraSilver is made from elemental silver that is mined from our precious earth and put through a proprietary process to create nano-silver which is then given a slight positive charge so that the nano-silver becomes a colloid that suspends nicely and evenly in pure distilled water.

That process is completely unique to NutraSilver. Creating sub-microscopic nano particles of real silver is what makes NutraSilver so powerful. It’s just one more innovation that we’re proud of.

The result is a dark yellow solution, which is exactly what it should be. When light is refracted through water off of nano-sized silver particles it gives off a yellow reflection, the darker the yellow the higher the concentration of nano-silver.

Some people are scared of the yellow tint because they’ve been told it’s dirty or weird. It’s not at all. That’s what nature produces. It’s impossible to have real nano-silver in water and have it be any other color.

So what does that mean to you? It means NutraSilver is a true colloidal silver, as it was meant to be. It also means that NutraSilver is one of a kind in that it is formulated with real nano-sized silver particles that move through your body and blood stream quickly and effectively.

Antibotics Ravage Your Body; Here is a Safe Alternative

Antibiotics Side Effects

Whenever we have bacterial infections, our doctor prescribes antibiotics. Yes the infection would gone but are you sure there are no antibiotics side effects left?

Before we tackle antibiotics side effects, let us know first what antibiotics are.

What are antibiotics?

Antibiotics are defined as chemicals from natural organic origins. Antibiotics have the capability to kill harmful pathogens and are produced from living organisms on soils. Pennicillium, Cephalosporium and Antinomycetes sptromyces are the main produces of antibiotics.

Antibiotic, further, is a drug which kills or lessen bacteria growth. It is a class of “antimicrobials” which is a larger group that includes anti viral, anti fungi and anti parasites drug. The hosts characteristics to be immune and keep safe from antibiotics make it possible for the antibiotics to be used to cure bacterial and fungal infections.

Human intestinal flora destruction invites physical and mental issues

Getting fat faster happens with humans on antibiotics too, for the same reason it happens with farm animals, gut flora destruction. Besides being important for digestion, probiotic intestinal flora have more than one immunity function.

The first is to prevent the bad bacteria or fungal microbes from getting out of hand. Too much Candida yeast and not enough friendly bacteria create Candida overgrowth, which is a quality of life damper and potentially a symbiotic haven for cancer cells.

Though probiotic bacteria do go after pathogens, the obvious good guy bad guy game goes beyond direct conflict.

Even from the gut, probiotic bacteria plays a role in triggering disease-killing cells in the blood as well as serving other immune regulating functions in both blood and organ cells. Digestion is very important, but gut probiotic microbes go beyond digestion and make up to 80% of our immune system.

Recently, a small number of medical pioneers have come across evidence that the rising numbers of mental disorders can be traced to intestinal flora imbalances. Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride has based her pediatric practice in the UK on fixing all kinds of behavioral and eating disorders by using diet and probiotics to restore gut health.

Types of Antibiotics

Actually there are a lot of types of antibiotics. Depending on what your infection is, you have to take the right antibiotics prescribed by doctors. The following are some of the commonly used antibiotics.

1. Aminoglycoside – Aminoglycoside antibiotics are utilized to deal with infections brought on by gram-negative bacteria. Aminoglycosides might be used in addition to penicillins or cephalosporins to offer a two-pronged assault on the bacteria. Aminoglycosides work very effectively, but bacteria can turn into resistant to them.

2. Cephalosporin – The next type of antibiotic is cephalosporin. There are a few various generation kinds of cephalosporins. The higher the era, the greater gram-negative antimicrobial property it’s. The distinct late generation cephalosporins also possess a better chance of a bacteria not turning into resistant to it.

3. Fluoroquinolone – This kind of antibiotic is powerful in opposition to many different types of bacteria, nevertheless it is mainly used to handle UTI’s, respiratory infections, and skin infections. It is possible to experience nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, or small pain in the stomach whilst making use of fluoroquinolones.

4. Penicillin – Penicillin was the initial antibiotic discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1929. Penicillins are utilized to deal with skin infections, dental infections, ear infections, respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, gonorrhea. Penicillins are occasionally mixed with other elements referred to as beta-lactamase inhibitors, which protect the penicillin from bacterial enzymes that could demolish it just before it can do its operate.

Penicillins are generally quite secure. The best threat is surely an allergic reaction, which can be serious. People that happen to be allergic to cephalosporins are very likely to be allergic to penicillins.

Penicillins block the development of bacteria cell walls, causing the partitions to break down, and sooner or later killing the bacteria.

Severe Antibiotics Side Effects are common

Whenever we have bacterial infections, our doctor prescribes antibiotics. Yes the infection would gone but are you sure there are no antibiotics side effects left?

Before we are gonna tackle antibiotics side effects, let us know first what antibiotics are.

What are antibiotics?

Antibiotics are defined as chemicals from natural organic origins. Antibiotics have the capability to kill harmful pathogens (bacteria only) and are produced from living organisms on soils. Pennicillium, Cephalosporium and Antinomycetes sptromyces are the main produces of antibiotics.

Antibiotics is a drug which kills or lessen bacteria growth. It is a class of “antimicrobials” which is a larger group that includes anti viral, anti fungi and anti parasites drug. The hosts characteristics to be immune and keep safe from antibiotics make it possible for the antibiotics to be used to cure bacterial and fungal infections.

Types of Antibiotics

Actually there are a lot of types of antibiotics. Depending on what your infection is, you have to take the right antibiotics prescribed by doctors. The following are some of the commonly used antibiotics.

1. Aminoglycoside – Aminoglycoside antibiotics are utilized to deal with infections brought on by gram-negative bacteria. Aminoglycosides might be used in addition to penicillins or cephalosporins to offer a two-pronged assault on the bacteria. Aminoglycosides work very effectively, but bacteria can turn into resistant to them. Because aminoglycosides are broken down very easily within the stomach, they can’t be given by mouth and must be injected. When injected, their side effects include feasible damage to the ears also to the kidneys. This could be minimized by checking the quantity of the drug inside the blood and adjusting the dose to ensure there is ample drug to destroy bacteria but not an excessive amount of of it. Normally, aminoglycosides are offered for small time durations.

2. Cephalosporin – The next type of antibiotic is cephalosporin. There are a few various generation kinds of cephalosporins. The higher the era, the greater gram-negative antimicrobial property it’s. The distinct late generation cephalosporins also possess a better chance of a bacteria not turning into resistant to it. This is naturally a fantastic point because it signifies the medication is going to be powerful for the lengthier period of time.

3. Fluoroquinolone – This kind of antibiotic is powerful in opposition to many different types of bacteria, nevertheless it is mainly used to handle UTI’s, respiratory infections, and skin infections. It is possible to experience nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, or small pain in the stomach whilst making use of fluoroquinolones. This works since it interferes with bacteria’s capability to generate DNA, so it really is harder for the bacteria in order to multiply.

4. Penicillin – Penicillin was the initial antibiotic discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1929. Penicillins are utilized to deal with skin infections, dental infections, ear infections, respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, gonorrhea. Penicillins are occasionally mixed with other elements referred to as beta-lactamase inhibitors, which protect the penicillin from bacterial enzymes that could demolish it just before it can do its operate.

Penicillins are generally quite secure. The best threat is surely an allergic reaction, which can be serious. People that happen to be allergic to cephalosporins are very likely to be allergic to penicillins.

Penicillins block the development of bacteria cell walls, causing the partitions to break down, and sooner or later killing the bacteria.

The most commonly-prescribed penicillins:

  • amoxicillin
  • ampicillin
  • bacampicillin
  • oxacillin
  • penicillin

5. Tetracycline – The fifth sort of antibiotics is tetracycline. These ended up probably the most well-liked antibiotics every time they ended up at first recognized back again within the 1940s. Probably the most widespread use for tetracyclines is for upper respiratory infections, STD’s, Lyme disorder, gentle acne, and typhus. They may be utilised to combat a large sum of diverse bacterial infections largely. Doxycycline and minocycline are the two tetracycline.

6. Macrolides- You’ll find a number of new family members of erythromycin (azithromycin and clarithromycin) that operate precisely the same way, but eliminate a lot more bugs and have marginally less unwanted effects. The erythromycin-like antibiotics can also be called macrolides. Macrolides belong to the polyketide class of all-natural merchandise.

Macrolides cause extremely minor allergy problems compared for the penicillins and cephalosporins, the most important issue with these medicines is they are able to irritate the stomach.

Probably the most commonly-prescribed macrolides:

  • erythromycin
  • clarithromycin
  • azithromycin
  • roxithromycin

Ordinary antibiotics side effects

Although antibiotics can help us cure infections and allergies, antibiotics also have some side effects. Some of these antibiotics side effects are the following?

  • Diarrhea
  • Mild stomach upset
  • Vomiting
  • Severe watery diarrhea and abdominal cramps
  • shortness of breath
  • hives
  • swelling of your lips, face, or tongue
  • fainting
  • Vaginal itching or discharge
  • White patches on your tongue

The most commonly-prescribed penicillins:

  • amoxicillin
  • ampicillin
  • bacampicillin
  • oxacillin

I do not want to take antibiotics; what is a great natural alternative?

NutraSilver is a natural mineral that kils not only bacteria like antibiotics,it kills fungual and virul infections. Bateries of FDA-certified independent lab tests demonstrate conclusively that NutraSilver has zero toxcity and is fundamentally harmless to the human body.

If you are a pathogen, you are going to die!

In six years of testing, we have failed to find a harmful pathogen that NutraSilver could not kill.

The most urgent problem in modern medicine is MRSA. In FDA-certified lab tests, NutraSilver kill 99.9999% of 1.3 BILLION MRSA cels in just 60 seconds.

So now you do have an alternative to antibiotics without any side effects. Get NutraSilver now and experience amazing, safe healing! They even provide a 60-day money back guarantee. Try and get that from your MD or Pharmicist!!


An outcry for help….

I believe that this has been coming on for a while but when my immune system lowered during my pregnancy, it started taking over my body. And I feel alone and like nobody believes that anything is wrong with me.

It started in my face with the feeling that I had glass or sand under my skin. I had some issues with dizziness and had blacked out on pavement and cut my chin badly and assumed that it was from that. But during the last trimester of my pregnancy my fatigue had become horrible and I continued having the skin problems. After the birth of my beautiful baby boy I kept going downhill. I became disconnected from life and not myself. I assumed eventually that I had post partum depression and got put on an antidepressant. My vision started becoming blurry and my head was in a cloud. In addition I had restless legs and bad aches in them, swelling, and numbness and tingling that would come and go. I scrubbed my face with salt trying to bring this sharpness out of my skin and after rinsing that day my tweezers became attached to me at all times. It hasn’t stopped and it has spread from my face to my legs and now my arms and hands. The more I try to remove the more it grows. Sand like grannuals that crunch between tweezers and even are in my blood.

Long strings of skin that only pull from one direction and curl up. Flat flake like sharp peices and ooze that hardens on my skin. Now blue fibers always everywhere even on my son which I breastfed for a few months which worries me now so bad it makes me sick. Biting and crawling feelings and the hair on my head has become dry and lifelike. The ends move around my face like they are the antennae of an insect.

No family support…

My husband is sick of my obsessive search for an answer and my collecting of specimens every day all day. Even after reading of how doctors are treating people I had to give it a try. He pushed my samples around with a q-tip and had a reason for it all, even the new thing coming from me, purplish fusia hexagon sparkles. He took some blood and gave me a new antidepressant and sent me on my way. I just want someone to believe me. I’m not crazy. I am not lazy, the life is being sucked out of me and I am becoming something that’s not me. My son is the only reason I go on and I just know there’s more to come. And what if I gave it to him? It makes me sick. Someone please tell me that I am like you and I’m not alone.

Public Replies

You are not alone. You are NOT crazy. It will harden you and you will find some comforts to make things easier. I was scared when really bad off for my grand kids. Now I have a lot of this under control like a hand full hear. We are not all the way out of the woods, but tons easier then when it hit full force. I use to pray for God to kill me every day I had so many bugs living on me and different kinds and different stages. That the bugs were worse then the sand and specks and fuzz and pieces of rice that would come off me through out the day.

If for any reason your baby gets this. I want you to know that they seem to bounce back quicker when given the right treatment. Usually GMO free food, No soy, no fake sugars. As organic as you can find. That would also include soaps and other baby products. That will help protect him and keep it low if he does get this. I feel so bad for you.

I want to tell you that when I first got hit full force 3 years ago. I was so scared that too much of anything would just bring me down. So when looking for answers try to pick out simple things you can change right away and then start adding to that. Go at your own pace. The big reason also is that more stress will make you sicker.

The lady friend who helped me knew this and would only give me instructions in steps so I would not just get so overwhelmed and just quit. Instead I stayed with it, because I did not realize just how much I was in for.

As for the hubby. Been through some of that like many others here. I had to learn how to limit what I said but he did always help me with task when I asked. Even the ones that were useless to him and he complained, but he realized if it gave me peace of mind then it was worth putting up with.


Oh sweet girl… no, you are NOT alone and you’ve found a beautiful family here. I’ve had morgs for almost 9 yrs now… but I can tell you it CAN be controlled. I was exactly where you are for so many years, but once I decided it was time to take back the controls and start living my life again (I’d been a total recluse for 6 yrs) things started to change for me. I stopped scoping, I stopped picking and pulling, and I stopped focusing on this thing by not giving it the attention I was giving it 24/7. Do I still feel the sensations today? Yes, but they’ve become weaker and weaker with time to where it’s easy for me to ignore it now. In my experience, the more you pick at it, the more it replicates. The less attention you give it tho, the weaker it WILL become. Rise above it and be positive and happy and raise your baby boy like there’s no tomorrow. No negativity honey… and no fear. Those are what morgs thrives on… so even tho I know all the feelings you’re experiencing right now, please do everything you can to not allow it to take over. You can do it shy… have faith and be the strong compassionate person I know you are. You’re gonna be ok… but you have to believe that and get into the right mind set by throwing any kind of negativity and fear right out the window. We’re here for you tho no matter what… we’re here to help you make it thru. Also know that once you do get into a positive mind set… your body will have a much better chance of balancing out again. It happened for me… and I know it can happen for you too.


Morgellons babies heal very quickly and with very small amounts of NutraSilver.  We have seen many infants become symptom-free in a couple of weeks.  It appears that Morgellons is ONLY contagious from mother to fetus. Otherwise, the only thing I agree with in the CDC Morgellons study is that Morgellons is NOT contagious between people (it is transferrable to pets).

Morgellons sufferers report that most, if not all of their symptoms are eliminated in about 4 weeks with energy returning, brain-fog gone and the persons generally reports feeling “like themselves” again.

Guaranteed Morgellons Disease Treatment

You are here to find a solution to your Morgellons infection.  You have found it. NutraSilver simply works and we guarantee that for 60 days. Do not suffer another day. There is no risk to you because your results are guaranteed. Morgellons done. Here is Connie’s story and how she conquered Morgellons disease using NutraSilver.
  • NutraSilver is a fast and effective Morgellons Disease Treatment   
  • Safe and Guaranteed to Work on your Morgellons Disease Symptoms, money-back guarantee
  • Relieves brain-fog, depression and fatigue quickly and safely   
  • Watch your Lesions Heal Quickly and fall off naturally 
  • Costs as little as $3.50 per day
%d bloggers like this: